Sunday, October 19, 2008

The Invention by Colin Powell

Earlier in the day, Megs posted on Powell's statement about Religion and Politics. There is an interesting back story to his comment.

After Powell differentiated between the "correct" and "right" choice, he cited a photograph from The New Yorker that displayed a mother against the grave of her son. Here is Powell's quote from MTP and the photo.
I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards--Purple Heart, Bronze Star--showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life.

Well that didn't take too long

Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan argued that race was the "predominant factor" in regards to Colin Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama.

Diminish it any way you can. Keep it in the news.

It may really be the end of times

The Eagle in Bryan/ College State endorsed Senator Obama. And Andrew Sullivan took the time to find it?

A Point That Needs To Be Addressed

File under things I did not know: Josh Brolin was Brand in The Goonies?

Seriously?

The logical consequence of anti-intellectualism

Well, some conservatives should be proud of this message. I think that the National Review should openly support the person who put this display on his front lawn since it is the logical consequence of most of their arguments.

After the endorsement

Even though we live in the largest media market in the country, we do not see Meet the Press until 10:30. Before I saw the actual endorsement, I saw a quasi-media event on MSNBC where reporters interviewed Powell about his endorsement.

After watching this interview and then the MTP segment, I thought the MSNBC was much better. Here is the clip.

Campaign Finance

This morning, David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, announced, via email, that the Obama campaign raised over $150,000,000 during the month of September. Yes, that is $150 MILLION in one month. The average contribution was $86.

This is an obscene and ungodly amount of money. Really.

In August, Obama raised $66 Million. At the end of August, Obama possessed $87 million in the bank. If you add $150 Million to this total you can understand why Senator Obama purchased a 30 minute time block on NBC, CBS, and Fox and possesses a 4 to 1 advantage in television advertising.

This morning on FOX News Sunday, John McCain argued that this money would lead to a political scandal. He stated the fundraising total completely broke:
“whatever idea we had after Watergate to keep the cost and spending on campaigns under control. First time, first time since the Watergate scandal. And I can tell you this: that has unleashed now in presidential campaigns a new flood of spending that will then cause a scandal and then we will fix it again. But Sen. Obama has broken it.”


McCain's comment is not pure of motive though as Obama's fundraising conflicts with McCain's sense of honor. McCain, as you remember, is half of McCain-Feingold, a law that, until the Supreme Court partially gutted, restricted the amount of money a person could contribute to a political campaign. By reducing the influence one person, read corporation, could have, you reduce the appearance of corruption as, cynically speaking, no one with or of money can be of good motive.

Some conservatives supported campaign finance because they thought it provided them with an advantage as they believed it would be harder for Democrats to raise money. Of course, they never heard of the internet, or even the internets, which has provided Democrats such as Howard Dean and Barack Obama with a great campaign advantage though only Obama has been able to take advantage of it. Money is not enough in politics. See Romney, Mitt.

For McCain money is not speech; it does not reflect a person's support of a campaign. Even though the zenith of our 18th century political institution, i.e. the electoral college, ensures that only a certain number of voters who reside in "Swing States" matter, McCain objects to the ability that some people could possess more influence than other voters. Instead, McCain believes that excessive money in political campaigns represents evil and corruption to the point that if we limit it, we will have a just political system that is more egalitarian in nature where people can contribute more equally and there will be a level playing field for candidates. No one person, again read corporation, can donate to a party and then seek a competitive edge in the market, or in Iraq (Halliburton), or on Wall Street (bail-out, er... rescue).

This has been the mantra of liberals for years and it clearly has hurt them and will hurt them in 2008. See Obama, Barack.

Back to McCain, corruption is the worst; the most unethical political sin. If corruption can be protected under the First Amendment, then what good is the First Amendment? Hence, McCain-Feingold. Who should care about lobbyists, most of whom work for the McCain campaign, when you could care about campaign finance regulation and its threat to democracy. Some person could gain special favor just because of a lack of ethics...

But, "my friends," my question to you is, why is campaign finance worse than other forms of unethical political sins that corrupt democracy, such as negative campaigning? Senator McCain? Why are political contributions worse than false political smears based on "religion," "socialism," or "terrorism"?

These outright lies corrupt the political process as do false accusations of voter fraud. At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick argues that complaints and investigations into ACORN and other problems with voter registration is an attempt to "undermine voter confidence in the elections system as a whole." And what of Republican "voter fraud" in California? Is this not a political sin?

Talk by Governor Palin of groups "stealing the election" undermines the electoral process before the elections. Isn't this the sin of that campaign finance reform is meant to protect us from?

I will wait for your denouncement of Sarah Palin and her corruption of the political process. As well as your apology for denouncing your own false accusations, which undermines the political process. And your denouncement of the Republican fraud in California. All of these threaten the "moral fabric of democracy" as your precious campaign finance does.

Update: This is a clip is McCain on Fox News today. Chris Wallace asks McCain about a Robo-Call is campaign is using. The call is based on a lie of omission as it suggest Obama worked with Ayers when Ayers was a part of the Weathermen. By removing the context of the relationship, it alters the meaning of the argument.

Why is this not unethical Mr. McCain? Is there is to be regulation, why would this not be regulated? Isn't this a threat to democracy?

Finally!

Thank you, Colin Powell, for this statement on Meet the Press:
I'm also troubled by not what Senator McCain says but what members of the party say and it is permitted to be said. Such things as, 'Well you know Senator Obama is a Muslim.' Well the correct answer is he is not a Muslim. He is a Christian. He has always been a Christian. But the really right answer is what is he is. Is there something wrong with being Muslim in America? There answer is no, that is not America. Is there something wrong with some seven Muslim-American kid believing that he or she can be president? Yet I have heard senior members of my own party drop this suggestion that he is a Muslim and that he might be associated with terrorists. This is not the way we should be doing it in America.
While I'm thrilled that Powell has endorsed Obama, I'm even more excited about the fact that somebody has finally had the balls to say what needed to be said. In a previous post, I gave Obama a tip of my hat for touching upon this issue, but Powell has really done it justice here:

Politics from a Parallel Universe

On Friday, Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann appeared on Hardball with Chris Matthews and stated, among other things, that there should be an investigation to examine the anti-American members of Congress.

Since she delivered these remarks, Bachmann raised, unintentionally, $488,127.30 for her opponent in Minnesota's Sixth District.

This is the consequence of being intellectually bankrupt.

I Still Really Hate Her.







But I LOVE Amy Poehler :)

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Saturday Musical Tribute

Happy Saturday, Readers!

To quote the same Ben Stiller line for the second time in two weeks, this here is "really a wonderful song." Yes, the triumphant jam at the end has been a source of joy for Harrogate, for as long as he can remember.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Assy McGee Award® for 10/17: The Right Blogosphere

Sure, you can call out all the usual suspects on the internet, those who scaffold people like the horrid woman featured in Solon's video, posted below. You know, the Little Green Footballs, the Urgent Agendas, the Red States, the Michelle Malkins, the Ann Althouses, the Powerlines, the Captains Quarters. Yes, they are all participating in the "he's an anti-American terrorist" meme, because that is all they have, and all they have had in this election. Four years ago they had homophobia, now they don't even have that.

But it's also the many little sites like this that do the groundwork of perpetuating lies, smears, scare tactics. Take a good look at this guy's site, Readers. Verily he deserves a shout out for participating in the great project of hate-filled political discourse.

If only Supa-T could vote...

Yesterday, I was at the mall with Supa-T and Harrogate's dad, and we passed by a kiosk at which t-shirts were sold. One of the displayed shirts had a picture of Obama's face on it. Supa-T pointed and said, "Bahk Omama."

Later, watching The Colbert Report (Supa-T goes nuts over Stephen Colbert), we saw a split screen image of Obama and McCain. Again, Supa-T pointed and said "Bahk Omama." Then, he said, "Who's that?"

Exactly.

Intellectually Bankrupt

This clip is from Hardball with Chris Matthews. It represents the end of a certain type of conservatism that is beyond intellectual bankrupt.



It just over two weeks, this type of politician will no longer be in position to greatly influence our political institutions.

"You Betcha": The Many Faces of Sarah Palin

Round about a week ago, there was flap over Newsweek's close-up cover shot of Governor Palin. FOX News Personae apparently have been squawking about this "unflattering" shot of Palin all week.

Critics have said the current affairs weekly was cruel to use the picture, which shows blemishes on the face of Mrs Palin, the Republican vice-presidential candidate, in sharp detail, with some accusing it of acting maliciously.


Interestingly, if ye go just a little further back to Newsweek Online, ye encounter this horizontal collage of Palins.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

A little bit of humor, a little bit of politics

Tonight in Manhattan, Senator McCain and Senator Obama appeared at the Alfred E. Smith Dinner, which is a charity event that honors Smith, the first Catholic Nominee (Democrat) for President who lost to Herbert Hoover in 1928.

McCain delivered his speech first. It is a very good speech though it is odd. If this McCain were running for president, the election may look different. In this speech, you can see the ethos of McCain from 2000. But the questions remains, who is John McCain: is the real McCain the one from 2000, a man who possessed honor, or is the real McCain the McCain of 2008, the one who lost his honor when he won enough delegates to become the nominee. He delivers a very good tribute to Senator Obama at the end of his speech, even if that it sounds like a concession speech and he knows he cannot win the election.

But this leads to the following questions: how can he attack Obama after this speech? Is that just tired political theater: the empty repetition of political attacks to keep ratings high for the networks?

Obama's speech was also odd; subtle but odd. While McCain's speech may have been funnier throughout the speech, Obama's good lines were better. There is also an odd point where it seems that he may have gotten booed as he discussed the excesses of the dinner celebration, especially in reference to the corporate retreats of AIG. It is a very poignant remark though it was not well received by the audience, who seems to hate discussions of their excesses. At the end of the speech, he delivers a very important message about helping others, which fits in nicely with the current financial mess.

One interesting point: there are a few points in the speech when Obama seems to show that he does not like delivering this speech. Maybe because it is for "play." Maybe because of "history." But there is some tension, which develops in the AIG discussion.

Here are the clips. For Sanity's sake, they are worth watching, especially as they show how McCain can be a human being---- even if it is a human being who knows he will lose the election in 18 days.

These are both good epideictic speeches, even if they just remind you that democracy is just a game for elites.

A final note: this is another interesting point of non-verbal communication. Obama enjoys McCain's speech; McCain has trouble enjoying Obama's.

McCain, Part I


McCain, Part II


Obama, Part I


Obama, Part II

I was a Teenage Lipstick Vegan

Apparently, I spent a much of my undergraduate years as an accidental vegan.

Who knew?

PETA knew.

Cereal with no milk? Check.
Cheap Bac'n'Pieces? Check.
Sandwich cookies? Oh, check.
Brach's candy? Yep.
The list goes on.
(Please find your own favorite ostensibly meat-themed item which made the list).
They call it veganism, I called it "stoned" or "lazy" or "poor."

It seems only fit that, if McCain can call himself a renegade, if Palin can redefine herself as innocent, and a sometimes dismayingly Mo'R Obama can credulously be called a radical Arab, then it is time that I rebrand as well.

Ladies and gentlemen, based on the most authoritative and unbiased sources: I am a reformed vegan.

And you can't deny it, because what is "health" anyway?

Headline from CNN this morning

The Gloves Come Off: Candidates Butt Heads in Debates

Did they butt heads, or were they butt heads? Heh, heh.

The morning after....



This picture, from Reuters, best represents the McCain campaign with 19 days to go. Senator Obama will broaden his attacks in North Carolina, Indiana, and Missouri; Politico reports he will also go after West Virginia, Georgia, Kentucky, and North Dakota.

Of course, this means that states such as Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan are no longer contestable for McCain and states such as Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Iowa are moving away from being toss ups.

These states are not only important for the electoral college but for the down-ticket races as well. I am not sure if the democrats can handle winning sixty seats in the Senate.

Update: a Photographer from Reuters took this photo of McCain. The description of the context: "US Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain (R-AZ) reacts to almost heading the wrong way off the stage after shaking hands with Democratic presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) at the conclusion of the final presidential debate at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, October 15, 2008. REUTERS/Jim Bourg (UNITED STATES) US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN 2008
(USA)"

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Tone and demeanor

Here is one thing to note: Obama's tone and demeanor rarely changes. This works to his advantage. He seems unflappable, but McCain easily loses his cool and gets irritated with Obama. Will he lose his cool in the White House?

Last 8 years

It is interesting how we need to change the direction the country's been going in for the last 8 years, considering the individual who makes those claims voted with the current administration for the past 8 years the majority of the time. How does that suggest that this individual is a "maverick" or a "reformer?"

Specifics, please

Here's the thing that McCain forgets--we want specifics. How do we reform head-start programs? Sure, I agree these programs need to be reformed, as does the D.C. school system. But how do we reform these programs? It's like reading an introductory composition paper. Here is my thesis: reform, reform, reform. But don't offer any evidence as to how you complete the reform. And then wrap up with a sarcastic comment.

Oh, we have?

I didn't know that. I didn't know we had achieved equal access to education. Thanks for telling me that, John McCain.

Pro-life

Can you really be a proponent of the rights of the unborn and mothers if you support cutting programs like those McCain supported cutting in Africa, which I blogged about last week?

Litmus Tests

How is summarily excluding a qualified candidate for the Supreme Court because of his or her Constitutional interpretation on Roe v. Wade not a litmus test?

Holy Crap...

They are discussing the Supreme Court. Wow, this is new.

McCain: No limit test. I'll call Bullshit. Or, does he know that he will face a Democratic Senate and will not be able to get a Justice in the line of Scalia and Alito (hey, a litmus test) on the Court.

Wait, he just contradicted himself. You need certain qualifications to be nominated. If you support Roe v. Wade, you are not qualified. But that is not a litmus test.

WTF is it?

Obama: No strict litmus tests. Roe v. Wade is hanging in the balance (i.e. women, vote for me). Women, it is your choice, but if the old one gets in, it will not be. Rights are not subject to popular votes and there is a tradition of the right to privacy.

Oh wait: Ledbetter. Women: who will you support? I support Justices that focus on the experiences of the common people; Abe Simpson wants his best friend John Jay, er. I mean friend Antonin Scalia.

McCain: Brings up an abortion related topic that has nothing to do with judges. Can you see that you are completely incoherent. Are you just trying to rev up the base with this comment?

Obama: Let's have a truce on the Culture War- let's prevent unintended pregnancies. McCain's head exploded.

State decisions

Um, historically, leaving decisions up to individual states has been such a good idea. Remember slavery, voting reform, and Civil Rights?

Perhaps

the size of government has grown 40% in the past 8 years because the current REPUBLICAN administration has involved us in 2 wars that have not, in fact, made our country any safer.

Who cares about Joe?

What about Jill? Barry? Sam? Sara? Parker?

I am Jack's complete and total sense of disappointment over this debate.

Coherence

I do not know who or what is less coherent: John McCain or the student paper I am reading?

I could say the same about straw arguments: who uses more?

$5,000 health care tax credit is . . .

total crap, and here's why. To purchase healthcare costs an individual upwards of $350 a month per person. My mother-in-law, who has had to pay out of pocket since my father-in-law died, pays this much. So an average family of 4 would pay $1,400 a month for health insurance. The yearly cost is then well over $15,000. A $5,000 tax credit only covers a third of that cost. Not helpful. And, frankly, it's about time Obama articulated this.

Hugo Chavez

Um, didn't we help put him in power?

And with Colombia: what does that say about the types of governments we ally ourselves with? Governments whot condone or turn their backs on routine kidnappings and murders of innocent people in an effort to get American dollars into their country? That's not taking place in Peru, is it?

**This last comment was added by Paperweight.

Split Screen

This split screen isn't really helping McCain much. Seeing him right next to Obama only highlights his age. I don't imagine his campaign is too happy about that.

Oh, and about Joe Biden: why is it a bad thing to want to use diplomacy rather than violence to correct problems?

When, when, when?

Other than parading her child with Down Syndrome around, how, how, how has Sarah Palin been an advocate for special needs children?

Oh, and Obama's right: we can't help special needs children if we put a spending freeze into effect.

About damn time!

Thank you, Senator Obama for clearly outlining a response to the idiotic claims that you associate with radical terrorists--radical terrorists who are now, by the way, respected professors in Chicago.

As Paperweight just said, "He just bitch-slapped, McCain with that explanation."

Who cares about advertising?

There are major issues during this campaign. And we are talking about the process of campaigning through the use of negative campaign ads...Boo Hoo!!!

This is a country you need to run. I hope your feelings are not too hurt you and you are not too bitter. How can you deal with Russia if you cannot stand up to negative ads.

Maybe you need a Happy Meal John McCain.

We Will Run A Truthful Campaign

****From this point forward.

3 Million Dollar Projector

That would be a projector for one of the largest planetarium and science center's in the country, which serves the greater Chicago area. Here is an excerpt from a press release put out by the Adler Planetarium after the last debate: "To clarify, the Adler Planetarium requested federal support – which was not funded – to replace the projector in its historic Sky Theater, the first planetarium theater in the Western Hemisphere. The Adler’s Zeiss Mark VI projector – not an overhead projector – is the instrument that re-creates the night sky in a dome theater, the quintessential
planetarium experience. The Adler’s projector is nearly 40 years old and is no longer supported with parts or service by the manufacturer. It is only the second planetarium projector in the Adler’s 78 years of operation. Science literacy is an urgent issue in the United States. To remain competitive and ensure national security, it is vital that we educate and inspire the next generation of explorers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math." For more on the overhead projector, visit the Daily Kos.

He said tell us things you haven't yet said. . .

McCain has already failed on that mark.

Yes, that's right; I'm live-blogging the debate. Frankly, it is the only way I can make it through another one of these.

Harper and Fellow Conservatives Reelected

In yesterday's Canadian elections, Conservative Prime Minister Steven Harper was reelected, as were many of his fellow conservatives. Based on conversations I've had with my students and some of our neighbors, this wasn't a huge surprise. Many Canadians, young people in particular, are following the state of American politics more closely than Canadian politics. Thus, voter turnout was at an all time low for this election. I also know that many Canadians were unhappy about this election, which Harper moved before the U.S. elections hoping that no one would be paying attention.

I hope this isn't a warning of things to come for the U.S. in a few weeks. . .

Political Junkie Gossip

Christopher Buckley, son of the Conservative Icon and recently departed William F. Buckley, has been fired (officially, he "resigned") by the National Review, an Iconic Conservative Magazine which his father founded. The reason for all the hullabaloo? He endorsed Barack Obama for President on his blog.

See Buckley's explanation for what happened here, where he compares his experience to that of his colleague, "the lovely Kathleen Parker," who as Readers well know, has been rendered a pariah by the Right for pointing out Palin's ridiculousness. Entitled "Sorry Dad I Was Fired," the online article is a must read for those interested in the currently caustic state of the GOP.

Opines Buckley:

So, I have been effectively fatwahed (is that how you spell it?) by the conservative movement, and the magazine that my father founded must now distance itself from me. But then, conservatives have always had a bit of trouble with the concept of diversity. The GOP likes to say it’s a big-tent. Looks more like a yurt to me.

While I regret this development, I am not in mourning, for I no longer have any clear idea what, exactly, the modern conservative movement stands for. Eight years of “conservative” government has brought us a doubled national debt, ruinous expansion of entitlement programs, bridges to nowhere, poster boy Jack Abramoff and an ill-premised, ill-waged war conducted by politicians of breathtaking arrogance. As a sideshow, it brought us a truly obscene attempt at federal intervention in the Terry Schiavo case.

So, to paraphrase a real conservative, Ronald Reagan: I haven’t left the Republican Party. It left me.


Meanwhile, on his Townhall blog, Matt Lewis quips:

Buckley's farewell column also (intentionally, in my estimation) confuses George W. Bush Republicanism with conservatism.

His father was a truly great man, so this one stings. All I can say is this is unfortunate, but I think NR is justified in their decision.

Now they should oust Parker, as well ...


Fighting over the meaning of Reagan's Legacy, fighting over the meaning of Conservatism. Struggles of Epic proportions, over the concepts of dissent and even independent thinking.

Heh. Folowing the GOP dynamic at this moment is like watching a Cockroach War, folks.

*****BREAKING NEWS UPDATE (HEH)*****

Matt Lewis just posted a follow-up to Buckley's resignation.

Read this line, Chums, and read it well:
Christopher Buckley's departure from National Review serves to highlight the emerging chasm between traditional mainstream conservatives (my definition would include men like Ronald Reagan and Rush Limbaugh as well-known examples of this) -- and the conservative intelligentsia.


Yay. It is nice to see the phrase "men like Ronald Reagan and Rush Limbaugh."

And then there's this gem:

If Buckley believes John McCain isn't conservative enough, that is a legitimate and honorable position to take. However, there are many options available to him, short of endorsing a socialist.


Oh. But you've got to read the whole thing because really the possibilites are endless. You wouldn't, for example, want to go on with your day without this rattling around in your brain:

I would prefer a dumb conservative to a smart liberal (in fact, I would prefer a stupid liberal to a smart liberal).


Welcome to Crazytown. The problems with the Bush Admin are that it was too liberal. Obama is a socialist. "Intelligentsia" is the most horrid pejorative of them all.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

It's So Over...

Here's a little tidbit for ya--I'd kill him.

Blah, Blah

Blah...Blah, Blah, Blah... Blah, Blah.

Updated: Blah!!!

Big O' Jesus Fish

Beginning at 4:05, Palin talks about her son's first tattoo.



And let's not forget that God wants a natural gas pipeline running through Alaska.

Monday, October 13, 2008

On the Political Gossip Front: The Washington Times clears the air on Levi Johnston

Readers and Board Members will find this piece interesting. Johnston and the Times pooh-pooh coastal elites who claim that he is a political prisoner. Indeed, his decision to drop out of high school only more brightly illuminates our own coastal elitism. So listen up, haters. The "Wasilla heartthrob" has set the record straight.

Morning Vile

On Morning Joe the cast and crew debated the extent to which the McCain campaigned should disavow the words of their supporters. Morning Joe himself, the man who believes torture is acceptable (4 minute mark of the effectiveness of torture), focused more on how there is an imbalance of attacks. From the clips this morning, it seemed that Joe worries more about the columns of Frank Rich than the actions of campaign supporter.

I would like to see if Joe can find the column that expresses the moral equivalent of this clip.


The best part of this video is watching all of the McCain supporters denouncing the man with the Curious George doll. Just wait for it....

Happy Canadian Thanksgiving...

to our north-of-the-border friends, Paperweight, M, and Wildman.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

A cool use of technology . . .

This article, on efforts to keep elephants alive in Kenya and protect the crops they like to raid, offers a really cool use of mobile phone technology.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Poetic Justice; or, Why It Is Funny To See How Conservatives Do Not Understand the Meaning of Irony

They are not saying "Boo-urns;" They are just saying "BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!" That is, until the music drowns out the crowd.

File under uncomfortable moment infinity: For tonight's Rangers- Flyers game in Philly, Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin dropped the puck at the ceremonial puck drop for the Flyer's opening game. The owner of the Flyers and regular Republican donor, Ed Snyder, decided to develop a political gimmick to feature Palin as the Flyers ran a promotion to find the best Hockey Mom. To honor that Hockey Mom, Snyder decided the most famous "Hockey Mom" in the country, yes that would be Palin, would drop the first puck for the opener.

Hilarity ensues when the Flyer fans reject the shallow political photo-op.



I am all for including politics into sports. In fact, I hate how sports ends up being a politics-free zone, especially when public money supports stadiums, etc. But I do love it when fans reject a political photo op and love the rejection even more when it occurs to Sarah "Hockey Mom" Palin. Synder disrespected his players by putting them in this situation; therefore, he deserved for this to happen to his VP of choice.

Talk about losing the important Hockey Moms vote.

McCain Walking Back Rhetorics of Venom???

Yesterday Solon had a post acknowledging this moment. Here it is, condensed.



Harrogate admits to having lost a lot more objectivity than he would have liked, at this point. Part of him really, really wants to applaud McCain's effort here; there is something very, very frightening being let loose at this point in the election, and it is good to see McCain arguing with it here. But at the same time, Harrogate cannot escape the feeling that McCain is fundamentally unserious about diffusing this ugliness.

If he was serious about dampening down these dangerous Rhetorics of the Scary Other, would McCain have Really picked Sarah Palin as his running mate?

It's Britney, Bitch



Well, it seems that Britney is back. I know that many of us here at the Situation have been hoping for this for quite a while, and it's good to see Ms. B back in her element: pretty boys, nudity, sexy disguises--remember the video for "Toxic"? Fun stuff.

Maybe if Britney can make a successful comeback, so can the rest of us... ;)

Friday, October 10, 2008

25 Shopping Days Left to the Election...

An odd day....

The Dow dropped again. Even though the country's economy may or may not collapse as the Government will purchase a share of the country's banks in order for banks to be in a position to lend money so we can have just a little recession, other aspects of the campaign feel different tonight.

Normally, I would say that as the economy drops, so does McCain's electoral victory. However, there are a few other reasons why McCian may not win in November.

First, the Troopergate report is available tonight. MSNBC is reporting that while the results of Troopergate are not devastating, the report states that Palin abused her power and violated state law in the firing of Walt Monegan. It is unclear as to what will happen next in this investigation other than McCain's campaign calling it a partisan witch-hunt.

For Palin, what credibility does she have to make moral arguments about the character of Obama? After a bipartisan investigation finds that, as Governor, you abuse your power to fire people for personal reasons you do not have much going for you. If you are not a reformer, have no knowledge on foreign policy and the economy, and do not know too much on energy... what can you offer your ticket? Christianism?

Second, on the campaign trail, McCain talked a constituent down. According to Swampland, McCain stopped a supporter from calling him as a "Arab Terrorist."
Indeed, he just snatched the microphone out the hands of a woman who began her question with, "I'm scared of Barack Obama... he's an Arab..."

"No, no ma'am," he interrupted. "He's a decent family man with whom I happen to have some disagreements."

Whether or not McCain pulls the Ayers ads may be a little too much to ask for Abe Simpson, but he "blinked," (not winked). Maybe McCain is attempting to reclaim his honor; maybe he knows his fate. This may be just the beginning.

It is almost as if Conservatives realized, as David Brooks wrote today when speaking of rhetorician Richard Weaver, "Ideas have consequences."

Third, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled today that bans of same-sex marriage were against the state's constitution. In a 4 - 3 decision, the Court stated that the State "failed to establish adequate reason to justify the statutory ban."

Cover Girl

It goes without saying that no one on this blog will be scandalized by W's November cover with Angelina Jolie breastfeeding. But I got a sneak preview of the shot and it's so beautiful that I wanted to share:

Inoculation Theory

Communication strategy whereby a person delivers a message to an audience to make sure that that an audience is resistant to future attacks. This strategy has the effect of reinforcing the beliefs of the audience, making those beliefs stronger, and diminishing the possibility that competing messages will persuade an audience.

An example:


Just as in the Democratic primary, one candidate is months ahead of the other.

Good-bye, Congratulations

This is something that has weighed upon My Mind for Some Time Now, Gentle Reader, and I feel as if My Silence is no longer so very Golden. For those Readers who are not, perhaps, the Most Constant Readers of This Humble Author's work, some background: despite the heavy-handed Victorian Sensibilities, This Humble Author sides more with her Sister Suffragettes than she does with her Sister Lintons and Ellises and Ouidas. That is to say, This Humble Author is, first and foremost, a Feminist. As she is a Nineteenth-Century Gal stuck in a Twenty-First Century World, she also regrets the lack of suffragetting in her life, per se.

All of this preamble to say this: I am saying so long, farewell, and good-bye to the notion of Congratulations. Not that I would not, say, congratulate Dr. Solon on his recent accomplishments. No, Friends, far from it! Rather, I am Tired, yes, Tired of the Self-Congratulations we see toward My Sister Feminists.

Recently, there has been Much Discussion regarding powerful women and their "Ability" to balance both family and career. This is a familiar topic, is it not? We have heard it before, Gentle Reader, and I dare say, even with the stalwart efforts of This Humble Author, we shall hear it again and again. Women are to be Congratulated for Amazonian efforts toward balancing Family and Career.

In my humble opinion, Friends, this damages everything feminism has fought so very hard for.

By saying that a woman is to be Congratulated for "Balancing Family and Career," we reiterate, again and again, ad nauseam, the following:

1) That family and career are things that must be balanced;
2) That to do so is Rather Difficult;
3) That this is a problem Unique to Women;
4) That if a woman does not do such balancing, then she is not to be Congratulated, which then
5) Assumes that all women want both a Family and a Career, when we all know Rather Well that some women want both, or neither, or just the one, and is not that what feminism fought for, anyhow?

Ultimately, however, by saying a woman is to be Congratulated for balancing a Family and a Successful Career, we are saying that Women Must Do So and thus we perpetuate the stereotype over and over again that Women Must Go Above And Beyond to participate in any sphere, public, private, or otherwise.

The personal is political, yes, and as My Third-Wave Sister Feminists responded to their Big Sisters, so, too, is the political personal.

That is to say, We, all of us, man, woman child, canine, must balance Something and Something. More often than not, we must balance Lots Of Things. I am rooting this in the discussions surrounding politically powerful women, yes, but if such women were childless and rather, say, the sole caretaker of ill parents, would we still try to give them the same applause? No, because there is something that is seen as Unique to Motherhood and thus Not-Unique to Fatherhood, or Parenthood, in general.

This is not a diatribe against Motherhood or Parenting or even politically powerful women. Nor is this a Call To Action. Rather, this is a Call to Awareness. Let us stop insisting that this is something to be Congratulated, because then we are just perpetuating the idea that women cannot simply live their lives in the public eye as vice president nominees, as the wives of presidential nominees, as community leaders, as graduate students, as stay-at-home moms, as single women, as teenaged girls.

We, All Of Us, are balancing something every day. I have great respect for my friends who balance work and children, the same as I have great respect for my friends who sacrifice personal time to volunteer, or stop school to take care of sick parents, or simply drive an extra 18 miles a day, with the price of gas well over three dollars, to let the dog out. Let us instead celebrate what we are rather than how we socket into preconceived notions of what one gender should or should not do.

Wait. I do not want to leave this Gender Neutral.

No, let us celebrate that women no longer need to socket into stereotypes. Let us celebrate that in 2008, we can deny those pre-conceived notions of what constitutes Motherhood, Parenthood, Selfhood, Partnership, Friendship. We can all of us Right Now make the Conscious Decision to Reject the Stereotypes and Labeling that, while we like to think we have conquered, still suffer under greatly.

The first step is to stop acknowledging that women, in order to have something other than just their careers, must Balance.

And then, we can say Good-bye to Congratulations.

GOP to Voters: We Will Either Rule the World or Destroy It

And so winds down the end of a big blog spree from Harrogate. But Harrogate needed to pass this along, a must-read for all Americans.

Apparently, John McCain sees the Democratic presidential candidate as not worth addressing by name. While McCain downgraded Obama's status to the subhuman "other" in the second debate, he refused to even acknowledge Obama's presence in their first meeting. This should strike viewers as quite disturbing, considering that the whole point of a debate is for each candidate to directly engage the other's issues and stances.


and


Increasingly, right-wing conservatives and Republican political leaders are issuing dire warnings to the American public that they – and only they – are the legitimate rulers of the United States and the world. This basic contempt for anything but one-party rule is manifested in a number of dire threats repeated by the party, with its members promising the end of Western civilization as we know it if they lose their dominant status in government.


And then for all you Nader sympathizers out there: Harrogate Truly Madly Deeply symathizes with ye. But hearken to these words before ye go splooge yer inviolable principles all over the voting booth:

The Democratic Party today may be morally bankrupt, spineless, and bland, but none of those are anywhere near as dangerous as the Republican Party's fundamentalist contempt for multi-party elections and bi-partisan politics.

Friday Musical Tribute



Oh please. You know it's freakin' awesome.

About The Last South Park Episode; and A Tip of the Hat to Andrew Sullivan

Gotta hand it to Sully on this, he boiled down very nicely the value of Wednesday's ridiculously out there South Park episode. "How out there was it," do you ask? It was sooooo out there, that Cartman and Butters' heroic, exquisitely vulgar, and ultimately penis-damaging efforts to stop China from conquering the United States was relegated to subplot status.

The Primary Plot of the episode, as signified by the above image (which Sully also has on his Post), involved our collective efforts to deny the fact that with their last installment of the Indiana Jones franchise, Spielburg and Lucas metaphorically Raped Indy, and though everyone sensed this when they saw the movie, we proved too cowardly to resist going on about our business, as though nothing had ever happened.

Verily. Butters' confused response to the whole spectacle at the end, "I thought the movie was pretty good," just doesn't cut it.

As Sullivan writes:
I was in denial about "The Crystal Skull" until that episode. Now I understand. I can't keep the flashbacks from coming into my head. And it's rough. It creeps up on you.


So thank you Matt and Trey, for forcing us to come eyeball to eyeball with a truth that we had been avoiding for months. Harrogate takes back every lame compliment he gave to the final Indiana Jones installment.

"Our job is delivery; not safe delivery"

I've been working to resolve a UPS damage claim for over two months now. I just learned today that UPS will settle my claim for less than 1/3 the replacement value of the damaged item, a mere 1/2 of the estimated repair costs. Why? Because that's the dollar figure for which the shipper insured the package.

Okay, sure. I guess this makes sense. It doesn't seem reasonable to settle a claim for more than the insured value of the item. At least not until you consider this:

They damaged the merchandise!!!

They were hired to deliver a package. And they dropped it along the way, damaging my stuff. But somehow they don't think they ought to be held accountable. Why is this?

You know, when I hire someone to deliver a package, I'm not just hiring them to get it from A to B, I'm hiring them to get it there in good condition. If they break it, then they didn't do their job. But somehow, they think differently. They think their job is simply to get it there, in any condition. If you want to make sure that your merchandise is protected, well you have to purchase insurance for that. Don't expect them to be responsible for what they're handling.

"Sometimes things just happen," the UPS representative told me. Yes, I understand that. But if that something happens on your watch, is it not your responsibility? "It's no different than when you buy a car and have to purchase insurance for the car," she followed up. No, it's not just like that. If I buy a car, and the dealer wrecks it prior to delivery, then said dealership is responsible, right?

I mean, what if insurance hadn't been purchased for the package at all? What would they tell me then? "Yes, it's our fault that it's damaged; too bad you didn't purchase insurance, because now your stuck with broken stuff." But thankfully some insurance was purchased for my item. So now they're just telling me, "if you want to fix the damage we caused, then you have to pay half."

Bullshit! Pure bullshit!!

How to Control the Media 101; or, Political Violence and the 2008 Election

As Solon recently pointed out, political violence is becoming an issue with respect to this election. Both Senator McCain and Governor Palin have been giving speeches amid shouts of "kill him!" and "he's a terrorist!" Has anyone seen a clip where either of these political figures reprimanded this kind of talk from their peanut galleries? No? Neither has Harrogate. But John McCain is an honorable man.....

Look. It is upon us now, whether we like it or not. See the desperation of the GOP, horrified at what seems like a very good chance that Barack Obama will win. Rhetorically, their last refuge is to blow racial dog whistles and to hope that somehow, by screaming 'William Ayers,' 'Jeremiah Wright,' and 'ACORN,' Americans will come to the conclusion that Barack Obama is a terrorist.

It is that ugly. We know that. But here's what's uglier, what really worries Harrogate the most. This is a blog first and foremost about Rhetoric. And so it needs to be pointed out, on this Blog, the obvious Truth that by screaming over and over again "Why isn't the Media covering the Ayers connection? Why isn't McCain running Ads calling Obama a terroirst enabler? Why is there a coverup for Obama's nefarious otherness?" By screaming these things, they create a story. Goddammit. Just turn it to any Cable News network, choose your M&M. You'll see that the Talking Heads are all Talking About Obama "palling around with terrorists." Some are criticizing the meme, some are pushing it, others are just reporting it. But ALL are replicating the meme. And that, dear chums, is all that the GOP ever needed.

So that's how the GOP drives the National Conversation. And as Readers know, Harrogate has long ascribed to the Argument that Controlling the Conversation Means Controlling the Kingdom. But in the end Solon is Also right that the Media's power at times gets taken away by the People themselves. Witness the Terri Shiavo fiasco, no matter how hard the Media tried to convince us that Shiavo's tragic situation belonged in the political discourse, people refused to bite. It was a good moment for our country. And now, it is going to be up to the Voters whether to buy this current garbage or not.

What a stain on the soul of this country if the GOP's beneath the floor tactics work. This is a gut check for the United States. A chance to prove that we will not be held hostage by Rhetorics of Fear and Loathing. That we are a people capable of being serious and capable of prizing thoughtfulness & pragmatism as values in solving large problems. Sigh. But it is also our chance to prove that we are the most infamously, banally unserious population imaginable.

But more on political violence. Little memes of violence are seeping in everywhere now from the Right, all of it connected to the Idea that to prevent Obama from winning, bloodshed is viable. Witness Townhall's Head Reporter, Amanda Carpenter. Pretty, charming, giggly, and always telegenic on Bill O'Reilly's show. Now see this blog post in which she blithely suggests:

There needs to be a backlash against these people. Those angry men at McCain's rallies need to start storming the Capitol


All hail "those angry men"!!!! All hail the idea of "storming the Capitol"!!!!! This is what we have come to. It is all these greenbloods have left.

And then today, we have a former (and indubitably, future) Assy McGee Award® winner, Ann Althouse, derisively blogging the following Headline:

McCain/Palin supporters are an angry mob. That's the virulent meme this week.


So the idea that Obama pals around with terrorists is not a "virulent meme." God, no!!!

But, the idea that charging Obama with terrorist ties is Real Hate Speech--That is a virulent meme.

The first sentence of Althouse's post tells you everything ye need to know:

To my eye, it looks as though the MSM is anxious to squelch any enthusiasm.


Hear that, Readers? To the extent that Some Media Outlets are worrying about the growing potentiality for political violence playing a role in our elections, said Media Outlets are really just Fuddie-Duddies wanting to "squelch any enthusiasm."

Just good clean Enthusiasm. That's what it is, when people are screaming "Kill him!"

Damn. Harrogate hopes that this is all a Tale Told by an Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing. He really, really hopes so.

Tribute to the Awesomeness of Last Weekend

As faithful Readers know, last weekend Harrogate and the Lovely Supadiscomama had the pleasure of hosting Solon, whilst he completed his transition to becoming Dr. Solon.

It was a real shot in the arm for many of us down here. Get togethers and fun were experienced by many last weekend, drinks were consumed, pool was played, and then there was that really strange dude that decided to join our table at the bar and carry on as though he'd known us all along. And of course, it was made all the better by the appearance of none other than the great Oxymoron.

Verily, there was a moment last weekend when Solon, Oxymoron, Supadiscomama, Harrogate, and Best Buddy/Supadiscobaby happily watched the following classic movie scene together.

The quality of the clip aint the best. But the memory. That's forever. "Oh yes, it's a wonderful song. I think you're familiar with it"

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Last time we saw Junior Soprano...

drool was pouring out of his mouth while a cat sat on his lap at a N.J. state hospital for the elderly.

It seems not much has changed, though he can do some voice overs...

Cutting off birth control supplies to Africa

How is it that George Bush and John McCain can claim to be pro-life when this policy, in fact, proves quite the opposite?

Analyzing Gibbs's Methodology; Or, Rachel Maddow Listened to Her First-Year Composition Teacher

One of the things that I constantly tell my composition students is that they need to "show, not tell." That is to say, they should demonstrate their points through examples and description, rather than simply stating their points and expecting their audiences to concede said points without evidence.

In an effort to emphasize the importance of this rhetorical necessity, I often remind students that I am from Missouri, and that Missouri is the "Show-Me State." Consequently, if their arguments are not showing me, then they're not persuading me. And if they're not persuading me, then they're not effective. And if they are not effective, then...well, then they're far from A-territory.

On Countdown last night, Keith Olbermann discussed the Hannity-Gibbs clip that the almighty Roof posted yesterday. In doing so, he asked Rachel Maddow to comment on Gibbs's methodology and to describe how he acheived success against Hannity. Maddow's response:

He did it by showing, instead of telling.

This wonderful pedagogical moment begins at the four-minute mark.

Thursday Musical Tribute

I woke up with this song running through my head this morning. As it is a good one, I thought I'd share. . .

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

One of Those Songs Meant to Be Listened To At Night



Damn.

Assy McGee Award®: Camille Paglia (Heh)

Harrogate suspects there might be Board Members at least somewhat curious as to what that crazy old gal, (Heh), Camille Paglia, has to say about the election.


Well, Breaking News: Paglia still calls herself an Obama supporter, but for the life of her, cannot figure out why Palin's Veep run isn't being celebrated as a huge feminist achievment.


So here's to ya, Camille. You Betcha and you're Darned Tootin', nobody deserves the October 8th Assy McGee Award® more than you.

Your concern about the foreign-policy world-view of liberal Democrats is certainly justified. The university culture at Columbia and Harvard through which Obama passed has been drenched in a reflexive anti-Americanism for several decades. Armchair blame-America-first leftism is the default mode. Disdain for the military is rampant, and conservative voices are rarely heard.


and

Yes, both Todd and Sarah Palin, whom most people in the U.S. and abroad had never even heard of until six weeks ago, have emerged as powerful new symbols of a revived contemporary feminism. That the macho Todd, with his champion athleticism and working-class cred, can so amiably cradle babies and care for children is a huge step forward in American sexual symbolism.


and

And where is all that lurid sexual fantasy coming from? When I watch Sarah Palin, I don't think sex -- I think Amazon warrior! I admire her competitive spirit and her exuberant vitality, which borders on the supernormal.


and

People who can't see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism -- the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.


That's right. But, Friends: These are only teasers. Follow the link to get the full ridiculousness.

The Obama Craft Project

Our friend Sarah introduced me to The Obama Craft Project blog:
The Obama Craft Project seeks to celebrate and archive the work of the many
crafters who have created projects inspired by Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign for
the Presidency.
You really should check out some of these crafty items! Some of my faves:

My Hero, Robert Gibbs

After the debate last night, Robert Gibbs appeared on Hannity and Combs. During the appearance, Hannity and Gibbs discussed the William Ayers relationship.

In this clip, Gibbs attacked Hannity for a recent show on Hannity's America that attacked Obama and his "radical connections" and turns the tables on Hannity's guilt by association tactics. While Hannity attacked Obama's judgment because he sat on a board with Ayers, Gibbs argues that if this guilt by association tactic is correct then Hannity is anti-Semitic since Hannity allowed an anti-Semite on Hannity's America.



Besides hijacking Hannity and Combs and brining rationality to it, Gibbs takes Hannity's position to its logical conclusion, weakening Hannity's ethos and limiting his ability to make arguments.

I wonder why Hannity let Gibbs speak?

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Solon's Last Post Reprised, and a Tuesday Musical Tribute




My friend, my friend hes got a knife
A statement from his former life
When he was easy but alone
Beside him was an empty throne
But what of silver silken blade
Affix his gaze, his features staid
Grasps the handle, clips the cable
One steps up, sits at his table
My friend, my friend, hes got a knife
My friend, my friend, hes got a wife

My friend, my friend, the clever ruse
Persuasion through his thoughts peruse
A hidden relic from his past
That wasnt there when he looked last
He feels it ticking like a bomb
Feeding fear, assaulting calm
Takes the object, starts the game
Moves closer to the flame

Phrase of the Night:

My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.
My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends. My Friends.

Ouch!

From The Rolling Stone:


In its broad strokes, McCain's life story is oddly similar to that of the
current occupant of the White House. John Sidney McCain III and George Walker
Bush both represent the third generation of American dynasties. Both were born
into positions of privilege against which they rebelled into mediocrity. Both
developed an uncanny social intelligence that allowed them to skate by with a
minimum of mental exertion. Both struggled with booze and loutish behavior. At
each step, with the aid of their fathers' powerful friends, both failed upward.
And both shed their skins as Episcopalian members of the Washington elite to
build political careers as self-styled, ranch-inhabiting Westerners who pray to
Jesus in their wives' evangelical churches.
In one vital respect, however,
the comparison is deeply unfair to the current president: George W. Bush was a
much better pilot.

Ideas Have Consequences: State of the Race



With 28 eight days to go and the second presidential debate scheduled for this evening, the bottom is about to fall out.

Currently, the Republican "mavericks" rely on guilt by association arguments. Of course, the self-defined "mavericks" do not engage in any introspection over the consequences of their actions.

Cases in point: First, at a McCain rally yesterday, McCain asks his audience, "Who is Obama," and an audience member responds a terrorist. Second, at a Palin rally, while the Hockey Mom attacks Obama as a terrorist, an audience member shouts out "Kill Him!!!" Additionally, as Matthew Yglesias notes, at the Palin rally, Palin continued to attack a press that dare ask her questions while her audience members wave thunder sticks at the press and another Palin supporter shouted a "racial epithet at an African American sound man for a network and told him, 'Sit down, boy.'"

Democracy is quite a dangerous game when your opponent is not a colleague but your enemy and the proper course of action does not involve compromise but death. If this election concerns without outbursts of violence, I will be mildly surprised.

Thanks to A.S. for finding this above photo.

Monday, October 06, 2008

Talk About Dirty Politics

For a country that does not take its politics seriously, cutting the brake lines of the "Liberal" parties supporters is just down right wrong. I guess that is what those hockey mom's do!

Rules for Tomorow's Debate

Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow....

According to Ben Smith and Lynn Sweet, here are the rules for the debate tomorrow.
Under the deal, the moderator may not ask followups or make comments. The person who asks the question will not be allowed a follow-up either, and his or her microphone will be turned off after the question is read. A camera shot will only be shown of the person asking -- not reacting.

While there will be director's chairs (with backs and foot rests), McCain and Obama will be allowed to stand -- but they can't roam past their "designated area" to be marked on the stage. McCain and Obama are not supposed to ask each other direct questions.

[T]he candidates are banned during the debates from moving to the other side -- and from wielding proposed pledges.


From this description, no one can ask a follow up. Pander Fest USA!!!

Why should the candidates agree to this? This is even bad television as there will little chance for conflict or disagreement. At most, one can have a "I feel your pain" moment, which no one could possibly believe; one candidate could avoid providing a substantive answer to any question deemed remotely objectionable and where have we seen that; or maybe, for entertainment's sake, a candidate will look bored and stare down at his watch. What substance?

Knowing the rules, my initial take will be this will only be one ad hominem after another. Maybe McCain will call Obama a terrorist to his face.

Update: if you read Sweet's blog, you'll find out that the candidates agreed to a process that prohibited notes. Now, in the VP debate, Palin stared at notes, which means she violated the rules and brought notes or, to answer Harrogate's question, while Biden was speaking, she wrote as many topoi as possible, which means she was not listening to Biden speak. What class!!!

Say what you will about Elizabeth Hasselbeck

but she lacks the basic intelligence to be on television. And ideology is not a good replacement.

She reminds me of William Kristol....and that cannot be a good mental connection.

Today on The View, the hosts discussed political smears, especially guilt by association tactics. Conservatives are making the argument that Obama is a terrorist because he knowns William Ayers. But for some reason, Conservatives do not argue that McCain is war criminal because he signed a bill authorizing torture or hangs out with President Bush, but I digress...

Yet, displaying her intelligence like she has never has before, Hasselbeck declared that she does not like Obama because unlike Palin, Obama is not open and has not declared his connections to political radicals. I forget, what happened during the Democratic Primary? Oh.

Seriously. If Hillary Clinton could not use this information to her advantage, how could McCain? It is not if this information has just been revealed.

But as for Hasselbeck, rather than discuss all of her lies, let's just focus on her standard of Palin. To Hasselbeck, Palin is the paragon of openness; Obama just hides his radical connections. I imagine that, because of Palin's openness, we know so much about her medical health and Troopergate, as well as her basic world-view because she consistently answers questions and holds press conferences on a regular basis.

Elizabeth- please, try harder. Because you look like a damn fool every day on The View.

A Response to a Recent Comment by Oxymoron, a Monday Musical Tribute to Led Zeppelin, and a Visual Rhetoric Open Thread

Comes courtesy of Barry Blitt, the same artist who brought us the famous New Yorker cover art of Barack and Michelle Obama. The image accompanies yesterday's New York Times installment by Frank Rich, provocatively entitled "Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain"

Meanwhile, click play on the video below, and ye shall experience a great performance by Led Zeppelin, of one of their hottest and, in terms of the almighty jam, most underrated songs ever, "Trampled Under Foot." Damn, those fellas could tear it up!

Say it Ain't So Joe

Joe Lieberman introduced Sarah Palin at a rally today in Florida. During his introduction, TNR reports that he stated:

"She's so strong, she's so capable, she's so competent," Lieberman told the cheering crowd. Emphasizing her "faith," he added that she is someone who "with your help--and God's help--will be the next vice president of the United States."
The religiousity continued when Palin bounded onstage. She commented right away on the number of American flags in the crowd, declaring: "God bless America--you guys get it!"


While I should attack Lieberman and Palin for arguing thaqt this election concerns the choices of G-d rather than human agency and the colossal mistakes by humans, maybe they are right in understanding that it will take divine intervention at this point.

In addition: Earlier, I discussed Kristol's column in which he argues that Palin/ McCain need to tar and feather their opponents. In this piece, Kristol quotes Palin discussing tomorrow's debate, saying McCain should "take the gloves off." TNR makes a good point: "Wouldn't a real hockey mom recommend that McCain "drop the gloves"?"

You betcha!!!

Sarah Palin, A Governor Devoid of Irony

William "They Will Greet Us as Liberators" Kristol, a writer who possesses no knowledge of reality-- just "forms", insults the American people once again in his Times column. Writing with the assumption that the American people are stupid and what should move the people is Culture rather than a real discussion of any issues, Kristol argues that McCain/ Palin should bring up the good Rev. Wright, especially during tomorrow night's debate.

When Kristol asks Palin, Palin states:
“To tell you the truth, Bill, I don’t know why that association isn’t discussed more, because those were appalling things that that pastor had said about our great country, and to have sat in the pews for 20 years and listened to that — with, I don’t know, a sense of condoning it, I guess, because he didn’t get up and leave — to me, that does say something about character. But, you know, I guess that would be a John McCain call on whether he wants to bring that up.”

This quote reveals nothing but contempt for the American people. Why would it be okay for McCain/ Palin to attack Obama because of his religious associations? Are McCain and Palin that stupid to take this route, especially with the religious associations of McCain (Hagee) and Palin (Jews for Jesus, speaking in tongues, Alaska as a place of salvation for the end times).

I would prefer Palin to actually read and then explain the comments by Rev. Wright and then explain how her religious "beliefs" and "practices" provide a better moral foundation for an individual.

For Kristol, this just reveals more pure, conservative, anti-intellectualism. For Palin, this just reveals pure stupidity.

Should we expect anything less? When you cannot offer the American people any substance, you must look to tar and feather... I hope no Wiccans will be burned at the stake.

Real Government Begins

While this presidential race is exciting, and all that, the real branch of government, the Supreme Court, begins it term today.

The New York Times argues that it will be a quiet year for the Kennedy, er, I mean Robert's Court. The Justices will hear cases on free speech (Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations), redistricting (Bartlett v. Strickland), and the ten commandments (Pleasant Grove City v. Summum).

Today's arguments concern the rights of individuals to being forth claims against cigarette companies that advertised "light" cigarettes as being "healthier."

The guiding principle for the Robert's Court has been to reduce standing and limit the people who can bring forth claims through the judiciary. The 2008 Presidential election may alter the way in which the Robert's Court can continue to do this.

During the next four years, there should be substantial shifts to the Supreme Court as Stevens and Ginsburg will most likely step down. Five other Justice may step down in the next 6 - 10 years as two Justices will have served for almost twenty years.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Nailed them both

Proving it is indeed a non-partisan show, SNL nailed both Biden and Palin in its parody of the VP Debate. I especially like how Queen Latifah imitated Gwen Ifill's obvious preference for the Obama-Biden ticket.

Friday, October 03, 2008

Congratulations, Dr. Solon

I hope you and the crew had fun tonight. We at the Situation are all very proud of your accomplishment, and many of us hope to join your ranks very soon. Cheers! We look forward to celebrating with the entire clan come December.

A tribute:

Drop it Already

Andrew Sullivan is still calling for the McCain/Palin campaign to provide proof that Sarah Palin is Baby Trig's biological mother. I'm no fan of Palin, and I definitely recognize that she and McCain are big fat liars. And I think that a McCain/Palin administration would be disastrous for this country. And I hope and (almost) pray that voters recognize this. However, it is completely unacceptable for anyone to ask someone to prove his or her parentage of their children. Particularly when there is no solid evidence to suggest that she is not his mother--only speculation and judgment of her pre- and post-delivery activities.

That said, the fact that Palin exposed her teenage daughter to public scrutiny in a direct response to the Trig rumors is appalling. And it certainly provides further evidence that Sarah Palin is ambitious to a fault, and she will clearly do whatever she needs to do--whether that be outright lying or abusing her power or exploiting her children--to get ahead. Why is no one talking about this?

If the goal of questioning Palin's motherhood is to undermine her character, then there's really no need to go there. She offers plenty of alternative (and concrete) evidence that she has no ethics and no morals--and nothing that qualifies her for the job of Vice President of the United States.

Baby Bear

So much more humorous without the stink of self-delusion and failure lifting off of him like cartoon squiggles.

Did we know this about Barack Obama and Joe Biden?

C and I watched the VP debate very closely last night, and while I was mostly impressed by Joe Biden, his statement about gay marriage really bothered me. To be honest, I hadn't done much research on Obama and Biden's stand on this issue. I did a little research today, and here is what I've learned. Obaman and Biden support civil union, not gay marriage. He is against Proposition 8 in California, the proposed legislation that would define marriage as between one man and one woman. In an interview with the Chigao Tribune Obama said "I'm a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman."

He did
vote against a Federal Marriage Amendment and opposed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. And he has also said that he would support allowing individual state decide the issue. I have a serious, serious problem with that last statement, and here's allowing individual states to legislate issues like this hasn't worked well in the past. After all slavery was determined by individual states, and we all know how well that practice worked out for the U.S.

Finally, here is a clip of an interview Obama gave at the most Human Rights Campaign meeting.



I have to say this really, really bothers me.

Friday Musical and Cinematic Tribute

A Double Feature. Both of these Scenes from Prairie Home Companion are replete with those good vibes necessary to a good life.

Streep and Tomlin go right for the core in "My Minnesota Home"



Lindsay Lohan tore it up, too, with "Frankie and Johnny"

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Palin was her name-o

I encourage us all to play.

And by playing, at least there will be a way for someone to end the night with spin-free victory.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

"I'm Voting Republican Because"

This video has been floating around for months, but it seems to be picking up serious steam once again.

Board Members here, it would seem, have gotten so caught up in the minor aspects of Republicanism, we have forgotten the GOP's major accomplishments over the last 8 years, and the Profound aspect of their vision

(M, Harrogate is especially wagging a finger at you, here. You don't give Republicans nearly enough respect. [In what respect, Charley?])

Because remember. Not voting Republican this November, amounts to serious business.

The Opposite of a Salute

Via the AP. Wag of the Finger
Los Angeles police are looking for a man who beat up a 16-year-old girl at a McDonald's counter after she complained about him cutting in line.

Speaking of Dolls....

BBC America is doing a documentary on "Unliving Dolls" and the women who collect them. This may be an example of the creepy dolls to which Megs-gh refers.

Wednesday Musical Tribute: Wild Man's pick

Wild Man and I heard this song for the first time a few days ago while driving home from the park. Now, Wild Man is choosy about his music. He often says "Off radio, Mommy" if he hears a song he doesn't like, and he also says "More song, Mommy" if he hears one he likes. With this song, he said "Shake bootie, Mommy" as he proceeded to shake his own little bootie in his car seat.

Black Like Me

Sweet J has become incredibly interested in the Lion Cub's (aka Kid B's) daily care. She's present--and helping--for every diaper change, bath, etc. She picks out the cub's clothes every day and helps to burp her. Last night she spent about ten minutes "burping" me. Solon and I have decided to bite the bullet and buy J her first baby doll.

So I'm online today looking at dolls at Toys 'R Us, trying to find a doll that doesn't petrify me. (Ever really thought about how scary dolls can be? Half of them look like prom queens or drag queens--fun, but not a good doll for feeding and diaper chages--and the other half are way too realistic, in a vaguely menacing sort of way.) I see a link for the You and Me African-American My First Doll and click to take a look. There's a separate link for the Caucasian version, but I'm thinking that a doll of a different race would be especially nice for J, particularly since the next G-H sibling will be adopted and there's a strong likelihood that he won't look like her.

Here's the thing that interests me: the You and Me African-American doll is about as black as I am... and I'm of light-ish to medium complexion, even in the middle of summer. I know there are some darker skinned dolls out there, but even they peak at cafe au lait. I'm really concerned about the message this sends to children of color who can't find a doll that looks like them. But I'm equally concerned about my blond and blue daughter, J. I hate that we live in a culture that idolizes her version of beauty at the expense of others. (The cub, for example, is shaping up to be a brown and brown, like her mama.) And I hate that this starts so young.

I'm in no way surprised at this finding, in general. Even a Pollyanna like me* is hip to the frequent shittiness of our culture. But take a look at the You and Me Doll. Even a cynic will find this one shocking.

* Shout out to Harrogate, who loves Pollyanna as much as I do.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Late Tuesday Night Musical Tribute

Such a soft touch. How distilled.



Phone's off the hook
No one knows where we are
It's a
long time since I
Drank champagne
The ocean is blue
As blue as your
eyes
I'm gonna take it with me
When I go